hepabolu wrote: > > the page behind the "appcoplet" tab has 'coplet' attribute and the page > behind 'apps' has 'coplet' as namespace in the form. > > I've just downloaded the result as static HTML pages and been reworking > the CSS from there. > > I've included a set of HTML files with a 'files' folder containing the > resources. > > I've left the HTML files untouched except for the first page > (portal.html). There I've removed all styling info from the table and > added an id (personal_area). I've also added an extra 'link' tag in the > header to include 'portal-page.css'. > > This is basically a change of the current settings, i.e. it still > resembles the current layout a lot. > > I'm very curious to know what you think of it. > Looks really nice, I think.
> I'm now in the process of doing something completely different (i.e. > different colors, images etc.). Just to see where we can take this. > Now you're making me really curious :) > One note: > > A coplet consists of a header and a content div. The header div contains > a title div which contains the title of the coplet as well as the list > of coplet-icons. > > I think it would be more logical that the coplet icons div would be > separate from the title div. > > Like this: > <div class="coplet-header"> > <div class="coplet-title">Title here</div> > <div class="coplet-icons"> > <!-- icons here --> > </div> > </div> > > If you agree, I'll figure out the necessary changes in the CSS. ;-) > Yes, absolutely - that's the way it should be (and how it was the first time I added the new layout) - I think I messed it up when I applied the latest layout patch from Klaus :( Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG http://www.s-und-n.de http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
