David Crossley wrote: > Ross Gardler wrote: > >>Carsten Ziegeler wrote: >> >>>The changes list is not current; although it contains the entry for >>>2.1.9, many entries for 2.1.8 are missing. >> >>It should be generated directly from the status.xml file in SVN so I >>don't understand how any can be missing. >> >>Please give an example of a missing item so I can investigate (a quick >>glance over from me revealed none). > > > Carsten, is this becasue they are in groups: > all the Updates, then all the Fixes, then all > the Addtions? > Argh, yes, thanks David, that's the reason - so everything is there. I'm wondering if this is our prefered way of displaying the entries? I think chosing the category (fix, add, update) happens somethimes on a very random base and sometimes when you add an entry it's not clearly categorizable into one of those categories. So, personally, I would display them in the order they appear in the status.xml.
But if others feel happy with this order, I'm fine as well. Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG http://www.s-und-n.de http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
