hepabolu wrote:
Reinhard Poetz wrote:

Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:

Maybe we could use the private committer's SVN area to coordinate and review stuff once we start writing, not to hide it from our "public" community but to respect the (assumed) magazine's desire for keeping things private before publication.



Other suggestion, use Daisy: Create a separate "cocoon-articles" site and collection add a rule that only doc-committers can read/write them.


This sounds good. I think it's a good idea to do a community review and I have already thought about how to keep the articles "hidden", but failed to come up with something useful.

I just wonder if it is possible to keep the site "invisible", i.e. it is only available through a URL, not through any link on the Daisy site. Just to avoid any questions and hack attempts (I know security by obscurity).

When a user arrives at the Daisy site they can only see the sites they have the rights to access. So if you add a rule saying onlyy doc-committers can see the site it will be hiddenf rom everyone else.

Ross

Reply via email to