Upayavira nails it IMO. > > So, 2.2 = important, and 3.0 = important. Both. > > We need to avoid discussions, implications, emotions, etc > that suggest otherwise. > > We need to give the message to our existing users that their > code will be supported for a long time, that it is still safe > to continue using 2.1/2.2. After all, we will all ourselves > have code using it for a long time, much like some of us > probably have code running that still uses Cocoon 1.X. >
+1 Remember: Without Users there will be no need for either a version 3 or 2.2! Matthew
