-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sun, 4 Dec 2005, Sylvain Wallez wrote:

Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2005 11:48:37 +0100
From: Sylvain Wallez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary mutation

Gianugo Rabellino wrote:

 Don't forget tools! In Cocoon 2.x it's basically impossible to
 provide decent productivity tools because there are too many
 components with contracts being too loose. If Cocoon 3 has to
 happen, this is one of the points I will tend to commit myself to,
 ensuring that every functionality can be easily managed, deployed
 and monitored (JMX, anyone?) and that those mundane and boring tasks
 that affect a Cocoon developer's life can be done using some fancy
 web interface or an IDE.


JDK 1.5 has a JMX console and AFAIU Spring allows to easily JMX-ify beans. So that may come for free.

While we are at it. I actually have the need for some JMX instrumentation in Cocoon 2.1. But instead of just writing some MBean wrappers for my components, I'd like to spent some more time on it for a more general solution to it (monitoring component pool sizes come to my mind quickly).

Is there any interest do discuss this topic for a possible implementation?

- -- Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDlGX1LNdJvZjjVZARAsKlAJ9nEDwqt5mxWYMINLmwE6TMSMMLJACff5iu
9tqmAaEx/0yOXb5HgBQOVhM=
=Dez6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to