Andreas Hochsteger wrote:
Ah, very insightful!
This would be a good start.
But with this interim solutions we have to be aware of the fact, that
the block has to define all potential XSL:FO implementations as optional
dependencies. This might not be the possible in every case.
Think about choosing some commercial XSL:FO implementation to be used
for all blocks wich depend on the XSL:FO contract or providing your own
implementation for another contract.
Why is just adding the block dependency that I *want* to use not enough? The
only issue that I can think of is that it doesn't prevent the developer from
using implementation internal classes. Right?
--
Reinhard Pötz Independent Consultant, Trainer & (IT)-Coach
{Software Engineering, Open Source, Web Applications, Apache Cocoon}
web(log): http://www.poetz.cc
--------------------------------------------------------------------
