-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 23 Dec 2005, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 09:16:51 +0100
From: Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: JMX integration
Giacomo Pati wrote:
Comparing jetty's jmx helper calsses to the commons-modeler I see
benefits for jetty's as that package supports MBean arrays whereas
commons-modeler only supports primitive arrays. MBean array would make
it possible to make array components implementing the same interface
(ServiceSelector) directly registrable as MBean (for those which
implements an MBean interface).
Ah, ok, so it seems jetty's support is the better choice then.
Yes, my impression.
So, big +1 for adding JMX support to 2.2 :)
And what about 2.1?
No, not for 2.1 - 2.1.x is just a maintenance branch - at least we keep
saying this...and we all tell everyone that 2.2 will be out soon, so
from that perspective there is no real need for adding this to 2.1.
Ok, I'll keep my fingers from 2.1 :-)
- --
Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDq9IwLNdJvZjjVZARAq70AKCH8WixxU30b2noLhLrwfh0w4m38ACg5nN7
OwxCdgeD56S3Qmu52EeDm7U=
=peM3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
