-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
Right. And the simplest and most consistent step to go forward is IMO to just use what's already there, providing a nice bridge to a rock-solid container used by thousands of people.
If you mean Spring as the "rock-solid container used by thousands of people" than tell me why are you using a Mac while "ten-thousands of people use a IBM ThinkPad" ;-)
I can understand Carsten as we've talked about it recently and we share some common reservation about Spring (as Carsten has already expressed). Maybe Carsten regrets having written that Spring bridge or the motivation to write it was a business or marketing need not a conceptual evolution.
So, after your veto to the change Cartsten has proposed the only way for him is to write another bridge that suits his needs. This is what I was calling ECM+++.
Admittedly I do not know how this bridging to Spring is done at all and I cannot say whether or not a migration from one CM to another will be possible to smooth this migration so that one day we can deprecate the usage of Avalon components.
- -- Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDuvdpLNdJvZjjVZARArRgAKCOA/TAwNJBR5nRqUVGVQjo4Nq42wCfWr0p 0UHIy7RCqUIw98YvNBll+ro= =8z7n -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
