Ralph Goers wrote: > Yes, you are correct. Too late at night. I missed the > synchronized(this) in the methods. Out of curiosity (not that it makes > any difference), why aren't the methods just synchronized? > Hmm, yes, I asked myself the same question, but got no response :( I guess I did this because of inheritance. You can create a subclass overwrite the method and then only synchronize the block inside the method which really needs syncing.
-- Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG http://www.s-und-n.de http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
