Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > Hmm, yes, like I wrote in my latest answer to Daniels post, I'm not sure > if this is the right approach. I think, blocks will be totally > independent wrt to releases/versioning from the core in the future. And
Yes the release cycle of blocks will be totally independent of the core release cycle. The actual versioning is independent as well. The fact that my suggestion copies ./trunk to ./branch does not mean that we tie the release or versioning of blocks in ./branch to that core. It just means that we explicitly state that those blocks are only guaranteed to be working with that particular core. The branch would effectively be in maintenance mode, meaning you'ld only backport *critical* bugfixes. Jorg
