Daniel Fagerstrom schrieb: > Jorg Heymans skrev: > >>Giacomo Pati wrote: > > ... > >>Each block should have the same groupId yes. Should we make it >>o.a.c.blocks ? (in analogy with [1]) > > > Everything will be a block, the core included, in analogy with [2]. So > it would be redundant to introduce an extra level in the groupId. > Hmm, don't we need some "bootstrapping", for example the cocoon servlet or the cli main class etc? I think these are not really blocks. Even if they are from an implementation pov, they are not from a functionality pov. So personally, I would distinguish between blocks and "bootstrapping" which could be core.
Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG http://www.s-und-n.de http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
