Giacomo Pati wrote: > > If the logger abstraction you mentioned is the Avalon LogEnabled one > than yes, we will still have to support that for backward compatability. > Of course we will support LogEnabled - with the only difference that you always get a wrapper around a Log4J (or whatever we decide) logger.
Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG http://www.s-und-n.de http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
