Reinhard Poetz wrote: > > I have no problem with a backport in general, but why exactly *now* when > Daniel > writes a mail that he has solved all problems that required a lot of research > work and Daniel and I only need some more weeks of "implementation work"? > I guess the mail was just a trigger. Now, I trust and value Daniels and your efforts very very much. Really. And I guess with the real blocks in place it will be a big step forward for Cocoon - no doubt.
On the other hand, I would like to have some features we already have in trunk, today. And I think it would be better to do smaller steps: the first one introducing a new core - which solves many of our day to day problems - and then the next step, the blocks stuff. I can only speak for myself: while I don't have enough time to help in the blocks stuff today, I know enough about the Cocoon core to add the features from trunk to 2.1.x again. And I think the current core from trunk should be pretty stable, at least as stable as the current 2.1.x :) So we could do a release with that stuff very quickly imho. Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG http://www.s-und-n.de http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
