* Vadim Gritsenko: > Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > > Reinhard Poetz schrieb: > > > > > If a testcase gets broken *locally* by a developer, the > > > developer should discuss the change on [EMAIL PROTECTED] and then > > > people can decide together how to proceed. That should be > > > the standard procedure in every development project, may it > > > be opensource or commercial. > > > > > > Can we agree on these very basic rules? > > > > Some of our test cases are already broken for a long time; so > > it's hard to tell if for example my new changes broke > > something or if the test was already broken; currently I think > > our tests are not really used.
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&w=2&r=1&s=Cocoon-2.1.X+Tests+Failure&q=b So IIUC you setup automated tests that were stopped since more than one year? I don't remember the decision to stop them. -- Jean-Baptiste Quenot http://caraldi.com/jbq/
