Re: [RT] Set min JVM to 1.4 after 2.1.9?

[Ralph Goers]

Vadim Gritsenko wrote:

Antonio Gallardo wrote:
WDYT?


I agree with all points, but personally I'd prefer to release 2.2 
(defined as: 2.1 + new core + mvn monolithic build) and stop 
maintenance of 2.1 branch. Don't you think this will be a better 
alternative? :)

Vadim

Even if trunk isn't released for months, I'd prefer that 2.1.9 become 
2.2 before switching to JDK 1.4.   In other words, I'm not in favor of 
2.1.x ever being upgraded to JDK 1.4.  However, I'm ok with creating a 
2.2.x branch that contains 2.1.9 and making the minimum JDK 1.4.  But if 
trunk can be released by the end of May then I would prefer that.

Ralph