Reinhard Poetz wrote: > I slightly prefer "Cocoon 3.0" as we/I have been using it for a long > time for OSGi based Cocoon and Daniel and I are sure that OSGi-based > Cocoon can be the platform to implement many ideas that were raised in > Sylvain's Cocoon 3.0 thread.
My ideas, which are progressing slowly because of the lack of time, are really diverging from the current code base. So, if they one day come to life, I doubt they will deserve the name "Cocoon". So +1 for Cocoon 3.0. Sylvain -- Sylvain Wallez - http://bluxte.net
