Hi Andrew, Andrew Savory wrote:
> Ciao! Ciao :) > > Simone Gianni wrote: > >> The default implementation will work on a relational database, using >> JDBI as a persistence layer, and will require a configuration indicating >> only database connection parameters (datasource name, or Spring bean >> name, see later) and the table names. > > > It ought to be possible to require just the database connection > parameters (no table names); by default the tables should be > automagically discovered. Yep, sure, I was thinking of it in a "single table" operation. Obviusly a side component (flow) will generate a list of tables with proper links to "thistable-list.do", "thattable-list.do" etc.. > > This might be a cool orthogonal thing to do at the Hackathon for those > that aren't able to work on Cocoon 2.2, as well. If you haven't > finished it by then, that is ;-) Sure! Simone -- Simone Gianni
