-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wed, 10 May 2006, Jorg Heymans wrote:

Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 19:13:48 +0200
From: Jorg Heymans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Maven dependencies


Giacomo Pati wrote:

I've run a little script agains the code base. We already have
dependencies of the same artifact with different versions:

POM: ./blocks/cocoon-portal/cocoon-portal-impl/pom.xml
        group=castor    artifact=castor version=0.9.6
POM: ./blocks/cocoon-scratchpad/cocoon-scratchpad-impl/pom.xml
        group=castor    artifact=castor version=0.9.7
POM: ./blocks/cocoon-chaperon/cocoon-chaperon-impl/pom.xml
        group=castor    artifact=castor version=0.9.7
POM: ./tools/cocoon-block-deployer/cocoon-deployer-core/pom.xml
        group=castor    artifact=castor version=1.0M1

POM: ./core/cocoon-blocks-fw/cocoon-blocks-fw-demo2/pom.xml
        group=org.apache.cocoon artifact=cocoon-blocks-fw-impl
version=1.0.0-SNAPSHOT
POM: ./core/cocoon-blocks-fw/cocoon-blocks-fw-servlet-impl/pom.xml
        group=org.apache.cocoon artifact=cocoon-blocks-fw-impl
version=1.0-SNAPSHOT

POM: ./core/cocoon-core/pom.xml
        group=org.apache.excalibur.components.sourceresolve
artifact=excalibur-sourceresolve        version=2.1
POM: ./blocks/cocoon-scratchpad/cocoon-scratchpad-impl/pom.xml
        group=excalibur-sourceresolve
artifact=excalibur-sourceresolve        version=2.1

POM: ./tools/cocoon-block-deployer/cocoon-deployer-core/pom.xml
        group=oro       artifact=oro    version=2.0.7
POM: ./blocks/cocoon-forms/cocoon-forms-impl/pom.xml
        group=oro       artifact=oro    version=2.0.8


Thanks, that output is very useful. I'll go and fix these right away.

It would be great if you could run that script every now and then so we
 can keep the dependency beast tamed.

I think it's better I put it into thetools section of our trunk so that anybody can check from time to time.


What should we do with those?

Fail early i'ld say, we upgrade all of them to the highest version
currently used and see how it goes.

----

Antonio's concern about the osgi block isolation is valid, but IMO it
does not apply as long as we haven't got it fully working. Consequently
there is no reason trying to accomodate for it now.

Exactly,that's why I've written that script ;-)

- -- Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEYvd1LNdJvZjjVZARAsX8AKCKsNvOaqjJdNFCk0wUq3H09m5TMQCgr568
oYSOPiiruCXco5vS1EUnWHM=
=EN0K
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to