Giacomo Pati wrote: > > b) might work, but since you want it to be the default ClassLoader I > expect problems users forgot about wrapping their stuff in web.xml. > Yes, that's true - but apart from that what do you think about the idea?
Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG http://www.s-und-n.de http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
