Peter Hunsberger wrote:
On 4/17/06, Adrien Guillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
XSLT will be more extensible for site-specific configurations, and more
maintainable than the existing Java code.
I don't see that you'd necessarily have to mark the existing
implementation deprecated. Having the two different versions as
configurable options might make sense, in particular if there is much
of a performance difference. Even if there is not, some people may
not feel that XSLT is "more maintainable" than the existing Java
code....
I can even give some examples of that...
Sitemap XSLT vs TreeProcessor: Java was considered more maintainable than XSLT.
XSP vs JXTemplate: Ditto.
Vadim
