Peter Hunsberger wrote: > > Interesting. Sounds perhaps useful without the dual implementations > as just simplifying the core, but the ability to plug in your own base > processor also sounds interesting; if we ever go to the point where > all our processing is completely database driven I take it that, in > theory, this would basically let us plug in something to jump straight > to a single fixed pipline (or two) without the rest of the sitemap > processing overhead? > Yes, that's possible and one of the ideas behind this. It seems that if you're developing web applications with Cocoon, you always end up with one single pipeline for 95% of your app. In this case you could just provide a processor creating this pipeline and that's it.
I'm also about to make a suggestion for a simpler pipeline api in the next days. Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG http://www.s-und-n.de http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
