Ross Gardler wrote: > hepabolu wrote: >> Carsten Ziegeler said the following on 28/7/06 14:00: >> >>> We have currently a split storage for our docs (and different ways to >>> update the docs). While the main docs for a version of Cocoon are stored >>> in Daisy, the more general stuff, is stored in the cocoon-site module in >>> the forrest format. >>> >>> Wouldn't it make more sense to use the same storage and way of editing >>> for the whole site? What does it take to move the remaining docs into >>> Daisy as well? >> >> >> Yes it would, but the problem lies in the way the URLs are handled. >> Worst case would be that the entire navigation of Daisy should be >> changed to reflect the correct layout. >> >> I'm not absolutely sure, but we could, as an itermediate solution, >> create a separate collection in Daisy in which we move those documents, >> which are then exported in the same way as the current Daisy docs. I >> don't think it would be much work to configure Forrest to do this. > > You are correct, this should not be too much work. > Sounds great :) Has someone time to do this? :)
Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG http://www.s-und-n.de http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
