* Marc Portier:
> Jean-Baptiste Quenot wrote:
>
> > I'd advise to write the binding using <fb:javascript> or
> > <fb:java> which is much more reliable.
>
> .. or even: don't use the binding framework and write proper
> cform-instance-traversal code in custom classes or flowscript
I second that. And with the ContainerWidgetAsMap and
RepeaterAsList, this is very easy to do the binding without the
XML binding... Unless you need a real mapping, which is still
useful when widget names differ from the field names in the model.
> Coming back to that original date issue in fact I'm afraid
> I don't get it yet completely? At which time is this
> 'org.w3c.util.DateParser' active? How does this become a
> problem of the binding?
CForms was generating <date></date>, which is not a valid date.
It is interpreted as time 0. This is when binding a date widget.
--
Jean-Baptiste Quenot
aka John Banana Qwerty
http://caraldi.com/jbq/
