Giacomo Pati wrote: > > Good question. Never used "plain" Spring that way, but > Cocoon-Spring-Integration ;-) and I loved being able to do it. That way I > was able to have "Mock"-Beans for mode=dev (speed), "Local"-Beans for > mode=test (functional), and "Prod"-Beans for mode=prod (live) just with a > set of properties no need to change/filter any config file. > Ah, ok - hmm, so the question is if we want to support this. The current implementation has the advantage the most of the work is done by Spring whereas with the old version we had to do everything ourselves.
Though I see your use case I would prefer going the "spring way" :) Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG http://www.s-und-n.de http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
