Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > Sylvain Wallez wrote: > >> AFAIK these features were never explicitely mentioned in our docs, so >> not official, and thus certainly not widely used. It may be worth it to >> be legally clean at the price of very few compatibility problems. >> > Yepp, I think being legally clean is more important here. > If we don't go this way, we have to find a way to support the old > version without *ever* going into legal problems (e.g. by separating > flow from the core in 2.1.x and make it available separately etc.) This > would cause pain to *all* Cocoon users. >
Exactly! Sylvain -- Sylvain Wallez - http://bluxte.net
