Leszek Gawron wrote: > Carsten Ziegeler wrote: >> Ok, it seems we should vote on this topic. As you all know, >> including the version of rhino in 2.1.x has legal problems >> and we have to do something about it. >> >> Fortunately, the latest version of Rhino is licenced under an acceptable >> term, so we could include that version in 2.1.x. Unfortunately this >> creates minor incompatibilites and might infect people using specific >> functions in flowscript. On the other hand, if we insist on using the > > which are? See this thread for more info: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=116195321200002&r=1&w=2
Let's please not discuss the problems in this vote thread - if there is need to discuss, let's do it in the thread mentioned above. Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler - Chief Architect http://www.s-und-n.de http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
