Mark Lundquist wrote:
> Or, trunk still has the DefaultsModule. Maybe that's what I really
> want here?
Hmm, my question is: what do you really want? :) Where do you want to
define what?
Carsten
> —ml—
>
> On Nov 24, 2006, at 11:12 AM, Mark Lundquist wrote:
>
>> On Nov 21, 2006, at 5:19 PM, Mark Lundquist wrote:
>>
>>> I was actually hoping to add an attribute-driven form form to
>>> GlobalInputModule, so that you could have, e.g.
>>>
>>> <some-var value="/whatever/{some-module:xxx}/foo/bar"/>
>>>
>>> (typically the input module would be a PropertyInputModule)...
>> Yeah, and, you know... I'm still thinkin' that would be nice. How
>> about:
>>
>> (a) Putting back the GlobalInputModule in trunk;
>>
>> and,
>>
>> (b) Referencing the Settings items using a different scheme, e.g.
>> "{settings:whatever}"
>>
>> ??? WDYT?
>> —ml—
>>
>>
>
>
--
Carsten Ziegeler - Chief Architect
http://www.s-und-n.de
http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
