On Jan 3, 2007, at 7:16 AM, Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:

 Mark Lundquist skrev:
On Jan 2, 2007, at 2:36 PM, Daniel Fagerstrom wrote:

Finding some term that doesn't contain the word block for "polymorphic servlet services", would be much less of a problem as it is different from the original block concept and not that many people have used the blocks-fw yet.Fair enough :-) So if someone have suggestions for a better terminology for the "polymorphic servlet services" I at least would be prepared to go for it.

 How about just "services"?
To generic in my taste.

I kinda felt that too :-) I actually almost suggested "servlet-services" but I thought maybe that sounded too unwieldy.

I think that "servlet:" protocol would describe pretty well what it all is about. Also it is implemented using the named dispatcher mechanism in the ServletContext, so it really is named servlets that the protocol dispatches to.

Then "servlet:" makes perfect sense.  I like the transparency.

 E.g.,
• services-fw
I would prefer servlet-services-fw or just servlet-services.
yeah, bag the "-fw" :-)

• ServiceServlet (or "CocoonServiceServlet"?)
ServletService would be OK.

That class does implement Servlet (extends HttpServlet IIRC) so maybe "ServiceServlet" emphasizes the right "is-a" relationship there?

• ServiceContext (or "CocoonServiceContext"?)
ServiceServletContext maybe.
yup

Also we could add some Spring bean factory and XML-schema based configuration, that put the focus on the embedded servlet instead of the "blocks fw" so [...] we could have something like: <bean id="org.apache.cocoon.blocks.sample.block1" class="org.apache.cocoon.sitemap.SitemapServlet">
    <servlet:context mountPath="/cocoon-blocks-fw-sample1"
contextPath="blockcontext:/cocoon-blocks-fw-sample/test1">
      <servlet:context-param name="foo" value="bar"/>
<servlet:connection name="test2" value-ref="org.apache.cocoon.blocks.sample.block2"/>
    </servlet:context>
  </bean>

The point here is that the sitemap servlet is considered as an ordinary bean and the elements in the servlet name space sets up a bean factory that embeds the sitemap servlet in a block servlet and make sure that the somewhat special life cycle of servlets is respected. Using a servlet in the Spring framework would be as easy as:
  <bean id="myservlet" class="com.mycompany.MyServlet">
    <servlet:context mountPath="/my">
  </bean>

 And would be usable outside Cocoon.

Very nice.

cheers,
—ml—

Reply via email to