On 04.01.2007 22:13, Jörg Heinicke (JIRA) wrote:
Jörg Heinicke updated COCOON-1977: ----------------------------------Affects Version/s: 2.2-dev (Current SVN) I'm wondering what this "caching" does buy us at all? Can somebody tell in which cases the reader is really faster? From what I understand in those cases, when one request.getRequestURI() resolves to different inputSources. I'd remove documents and quickTest completely.
Found the original commit [1] and the thread where it was discussed before [2]. But I can not really see how it helps to optimize and whether it is an optimization at all.
With the document list but without quickTest it would behave differently if the requestURI would lead to a different InputSource - I wonder if this can happen. Without the document list it would not behave differently than now I think as no check against a former InputSource.getURI() can be done. So what's up with that stuff? Is that still valid?
Regards Jörg PS: Happy New Year btw. :) [1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=104019898011748&w=4 [2] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=102854688200001&r=1&w=4
