Mark Lundquist wrote:
On Jan 15, 2007, at 3:08 AM, Leszek Gawron wrote:
We should come up with some agreement on how to name the modules.
That reminds me, I was wondering about the artifactIds / names of module
directories in the svn tree... why do they all start w/ "cocoon-"? It
seems kinda redundant since the groupId is "org.apache.cocoon". I'm
sure there must have been a reason, I'm just curious what it is :-).
One possible reason is that the resulting JAR artifacts only contain the
artifact name (and version), so having the 'redundant' identifier makes
the JAR file more identifiable once everything's flattened into e.g.
WEB-INF/lib.
Also it occurs to me that "org.apache.cocoon.core" and
"org.apache.cocoon.blocks" could be used as groupIds if that were
thought to help make things clearer...
—ml—
