On 3/14/07, Grzegorz Kossakowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Peter Hunsberger napisał(a):
<snip/>
Now, blocks are _completely_ seperated from each other from their architecture foundation. It means that resources in one block do not interfere with resources in other block in any way. What's more, it's virtually not possible to access resources from block A in block B (or at least we should not assume that because it's not part of contract between blocks) directly. I mean that even if blockA is mounted on /root/BlockA and blockB is mounted /root/BlockB we are not allowed to access resources from blockA in blockB in this way: map:read src="../blockA/foo.js". Relative paths are only relative to the block's context. From every block's perspective block's context is root path and there is no superior location/path whatever.
<snip/> Ok, got it. From your original e-mail I thought you were proposing to have _all_ files placed in the "external" directory available via the _same_ sitemap URI. Instead you're saying that you still have to access the resources via the servlet: protocol. In that case, sure, I don't see any real problem. If nothing else at least the project supplied blocks will become a little more predictable; though that means someone has to go through them all and make them conform to the same layout... -- Peter Hunsberger
