On 16.03.2007 11:54, Ross Gardler wrote:
Also perhaps some other information could be tied in.. such as who
are the experts on which blocks or areas within Cocoon
Independent from the counter argument already given the Cocoon changes
site [1] already gives this information in a more verbose way. Nobody
needs to maintain this list explicitely and nobody might get the
feeling that private mails are encouraged.
That's not more verbose, it also provides a simple list of contributors
to a specific version and contributors to prrevious versions (see the
end of the document).
However, this only credits people who have an entry in status.xml, so
does not credit people who have done other work, such as user support,
dev discussion, issue tracking etc.
My comment was not about giving any credits, it was just about assigning
people to code and getting contact to "experts" on specific code areas
(what Ross McDonald aimed to). While having this information explicitely
was discouraged I said it is already there - implicitely and more verbose.
Jörg
