Daniel Fagerstrom pisze:
Grzegorz Kossakowski skrev:
Daniel Fagerstrom pisze:
I wonder why we really need new source in this case at all.
Possibility to reference bean by bean id instead of connection name
was already discussed: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-2044
Why do we need to invent new source?
The important part is that "servlets:/" is listable and give a listing
of all servlet services. The above thing is because the listed servlet
services must have own URIs to be usable. If that could be done by
extending the ordinary servlet: protocol I'm fine with that as well. But
extending the servlet: protocol has the problem that you use the same
URI part for two distinct uses, both for servlet service relative names
and for some kind of global naming scheme like bean id. There is some
small risk that they are going to collide.
What about omitting "/" part while asking for list of servlet bean ids?
It seems even more logical to me because the syntax will be:
servlet:[<bean id or connection name>:]/<rest of the path>
[] - means that it's optional part
Do you mean that servlet will be able to construct it's connection at
runtime or it will be able to reference resources from servlets that
it is not connected to?
Does second option fits to our design of servlet-service-fw?
I'm not able to parse the above paragraphs at all. Could you please be a
little bit more verbose, so that I can understand what all the uses of
"servlet" and "it" refers to ;)
Hehe ;-)
My English sometimes really limits me and that's the reason why I don't write [RT] e-mails even though I have some ideas. It's not that bad
in the end because I have to focus on the work instead of depicting a glowing vision of the future ;-)
Returning back to the topic:
Let's assume we have servlet A that get list of the other servlet beans' ids and want to know if it has some samples. So servlet A must make
list of calls:
servlet:B's-id:/some_file
servlet:B'C-id:/some_file
...
But none of these servlets are registered as connections of servlet A so I would like to know if we are going to make it possible to request
resources from servlets that another servlet is not connected to?
--
Grzegorz Kossakowski
http://reflectingonthevicissitudes.wordpress.com/
