On 23.05.2007 13:07, hepabolu wrote:
+ I would comment (or even close-wontfix?) that bug with a reference to the above conclusion from carsten. Just in case somebody would want to apply the patch without giving it more thought...I just added a comment.
Using the param is an appropriate solution and the patch is no longer valid. Since the issue (COCOON-1686) was especially created as patch to COCOON-1671 I closed it, but added a comment and link from COCOON-1671 to it.
Jörg
