Carsten Ziegeler pisze:
Now, I don't want to spoil the contest here, but I would be great if we
could choose a real url syntax which is parsable by the java.net.URL
class. It is a) good to have valid urls and b) a long time ago we had
the idea of just using plain java.net.url implementations instead of the
source resolver bean (and actually I'm currently working on this), so
all sources which are now available through the source resolver will be
available using the plain java api.
So, I think its worth considering this now :)
Syntax proposed by Reinhard conforms URI specification. I know that URI is a superset of URL that has quite loose structure so almost every
syntax that makes sense is a valid URI.
I think that you have a valid point but how we can express current URIs by using URLs? Any neat ideas? In order to propose something on my
own I must read URL spec. to know where are boundaries.
--
Grzegorz Kossakowski
http://reflectingonthevicissitudes.wordpress.com/
