hepabolu pisze:
Grzegorz Kossakowski said the following on 4/7/07 10:12:
First: some idiot decided to 'service' my ADSL connection, thus cutting
me off and now three parties are haggling about who is responsible for
reconnecting me. End result: I'm on dial-up for the time being and I
won't read/answer much.
Bad things happens. I hope you will sort out that issue quickly.
Thanks David and Joerg. I'm really confused, wiki page is talking most
of the time about checking out /site from svn and updating docs there.
Right. This is ancient. Please remove that text from the wiki page.
Ok, will do it.
Does this means we really use Daisy and docs from legacydocs to
generate 2.1 documentation or not? What should I edit?
Yes we do. The old way was too time consuming and therefore a blocker
for writing docs. That's why we moved to Daisy.
I see. I'm already familiar with Daisy so I'm fine with that way.
I thought that legacydocs import to Daisy was meant as a start base
for 2.2 docs. Could you explain it little more?
Both:
- generation of 2.1 docs
- base for 2.2 docs
Hope this helps.
Almost. :) If I want to start a document that is based on something from 2.1 I should _copy_ that document instead of _moving_ right? Legacy
docs should be modified only for improvements, right?
Thanks for your explanations.
--
Grzegorz Kossakowski
http://reflectingonthevicissitudes.wordpress.com/
