On Sat, 2007-08-11 at 11:22 +0200, Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote:
> Speaking about myself I prefer much more language prefixes and I think we
> should go for it. The
> question that we need to answer is if we want to support #{} syntax in
> sitemap? Since it was never
> there I don't think it makes sense to do so.
I also don't see the benefit of extending the sitemap syntax. The
existing {input-module:parameter} syntax is flexible enough to support
{jexl:cocoon.request.some_param} and {jxpath:cocoon/request/some_param},
and that is not much harder to read or write than the ${} and #{}
equivalents.
Besides it avoids all problems where you would want to have a literal $
or # immediately followed by an input module expression. (Although I
cannot think just now of an example where that would occur.)
Cheers, Alfred.
