Daniel Fagerstrom wrote: >> > Seem like a good idea, JSTL core and JSTL XML (what is the difference?) > seem to contain about the same functionality as JXTG. I would have > prefered getting rid of the set tag though. We *could* decide to just support a well-defined sub set, but I think it makes more sense to go with the standard.
> > Any idea about how to implement it? Is there any SAX generating > implementation that we could embed and reuse as a generator? Or maybe a > STL implementation that we could reuse inside our template framework? Or > do you mean that we implement the STL tags oursevelves? > Actually I don't know - this is a think I have on my long "nice-to-have-wish-list-for-cocoon" for years now, but never had time to look into. I hope that we could just reuse something - if we have to implement the whole stuff ourselves, then I would forget about it. But I guess that there is something out there. Perhaps we could also just use a jsp compiler and are done. In that case we would support more than JSTL but I wouldn't mind. I guess people would love to code JSPs in Cocoon (whether I think that this is a good idea or not, doesn't matter). Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
