[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1765?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12524400
]
Ralph Goers commented on COCOON-1765:
-------------------------------------
I don't care what is used as long as it is an interface that can have any
implementation (including a proprietary logging framework) plugged in.
> Logging
> -------
>
> Key: COCOON-1765
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1765
> Project: Cocoon
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: - OSGi integration
> Reporter: Reinhard Poetz
>
> [...] But my main thoughts is that logging need to be a centralized service,
> common for all blocks (separate logging solutions for each block would be a
> pain).
> The logging implementation is contained in a block (that is installed early)
> and makes the logger available as a service that other block can get through
> the service manager. This way the logging implementation is chosen by the
> choice of logging block. Observe that I only is talking about the blocks fw,
> within a block an ordinary ECM can be set up and it will inject the logger in
> its managed objects through the usual Avalon style.
> Using the same logger interface everywhere is also practical I guess we
> continue to use the o.a.avalon.framework.logger.Logger one.
> (by Daniel Fagerstrom:
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-cocoon-dev&m=113889468124728&w=2)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.