Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > On 9/20/07, Vadim Gritsenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Looking at the program - "Bertrand Delacretaz/Carsten Ziegeler: "Bye bye >> Avalon: >> an introduction to OSGi"" - should this really be "Spring", not "OSGi"? :) > > It is OSGi indeed: we're going to introduce the general principles, > and show how easy it is to create OSGi bundles and declarative > services using the maven-bundle-plugin and maven-scr-plugin from > Apache Felix. All this in 30 minutes, so bring your seatbelts! > > I agree that Spring is closer to Avalon than OSGi is...but at the > conceptual level all three can be seen as modularization systems, > working on different levels. The reference to Avalon in that title is > a bit tongue-in-cheek of course, related to our collective history ;-) > <WARNING: LAME JOKE AHEAD>
After the talk you'll see that moving to Spring was the wrong decision and we should now convert the whole code base to OSGi. </WARNING> Seriously, OSGi and Spring work as Bertrand noted at different levels; Bertrand and I will show some basics of OSGi. Based on this "infrastructure" you can use "plain OSGi", Spring or you could even think of creating an OSGi-Avalon bridge. I think Daniel will show in his talk more about OSGi and Spring. Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
