Andrew Stevens wrote:
Okay, let's try this again, stripping out the less than signs... You'd
think hotmail were deliberately trying to get me to switch to google
mail ;-) > Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2007 09:27:57 +0200 > From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] > ... > > You can work around this by using
xsl:comment instead of CDATA. > This will not work if there's a JX
generation or transformation after > the xsl:comment because it will
remove all information in the > xsl:comment. > > Regards, > > Jasha
Joachimsthal Just a random thought - if hiding script tags' contents
with comment tags is still "best practice", couldn't the (X)HTML
serializers be changed to add those automatically if not present (with,
say, a configuration parameter to disable it if needed)? That way, you
can just put the javascript directly in the element in your XSL and
still have it properly hidden, without having to mess around with CDATA
or xsl:comment and with no worries that it might be considered a comment
and removed by a later transformer or c/xinclude? Andrew. --
http://pseudoq.sourceforge.net/ Open source java Sudoku app
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The next generation of MSN Hotmail has arrived - Windows Live Hotmail
<http://www.newhotmail.co.uk>
Hmmm I guess you'd have to switch :)
Vadim
