Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
On Jan 5, 2008, at 9:53 AM, hepabolu wrote:
Grzegorz Kossakowski said the following on 5/1/08 13:51:
Hi,
I added[1] FAQ-entry for the subject of much controversy among Cocoon
community. Now I wonder how to
get it published, I found old document aggregating all FAQ entries
but it doesn't work ATM. Before I
go and fix it I would like to ask your opinion on separating FAQs for
Cocoon 2.1 and Cocoon 2.2.
Obviously, some entries addressed to 2.2 version has no value for 2.1
user. If we are going to
separate FAQ documents, how we will mark to which version particular
entries are addressed? Using
tags or some other mechanism?
My personal opinion is that tags will be the most convenient choice.
[1] http://cocoon.zones.apache.org/daisy/cdocs/1425.html
[2] http://cocoon.zones.apache.org/daisy/documentation/856.html
The regular Daisy approach is to create a branch for each version.
That way you can answer the same FAQ different for each version. I'm
not sure if you can batch move documents to a specific branch.
IMHO there is no much potential for shared FAQs with two different
answers for each version. I think it's a better approach to have unique
FAQ document per version, meaning for 2.2 we should start from scratch.
+1
additionally I've never tested if the Daisy exporter works correctly with
references to branched documents. If we ever need this in the future, we will
have to try it out before.
--
Reinhard Pötz Managing Director, {Indoqa} GmbH
http://www.indoqa.com/en/people/reinhard.poetz/
Member of the Apache Software Foundation
Apache Cocoon Committer, PMC member, PMC Chair [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________________________________________________
