Carsten Ziegeler pisze:
Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote:
This brings us to couple of questions:
1. Do we want to have a policy to have only one base package (e.g.
o.a.c.servletservice.*) per one module (artifact, JAR, you name it)?
2. What OSGi folks can say about this situation? I remember that there
was some requirement to have clean package structure in order to run
in OSGi environment easily but I'm not expert in this area.
There shouldn't be two different artifacts *exporting* the same package,
which means having classes intendet to be used by other artifacts in
this package. That's afaik the only requirement for OSGi.
This can be easily reached if a block uses o.a.c.{blockname} for its own
packages.
So do you think we need to rename o.a.c.callstack into
o.a.c.servletservice.callstack ?
--
Grzegorz Kossakowski