Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] pisze: >> Author: reinhard Date: Thu Aug 14 00:43:31 2008 New Revision: 685792 >> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=685792&view=rev Log: The >> BlockPathPropertyPlaceholderConfigurer module is *usually* only useful >> if the SSF is used >> together with Cocoon. In this case you always need the SSF-components. >> Hence it's best to move it >> to into this module so that Cocoon 2.2 can still be run in the >> 'classic' mode. > > Somehow agreed. It looks like nobody is going to use SSF+Blocks > infrastructure without Cocoon Core, right? :-) > >> (I can't help myself but somehow the >> BlockPathPropertyPlaceholderConfigurer seems to be a hack >> anyway ...) > > What do you mean by that? What makes it hacky?
I'm still not convinced that we should expose block resources directly. But there are use cases for it (http://cocoon.markmail.org/message/vr72n4vr7lfpppfe) and we've already introduced this contract so it probably doesn't make much sense to discuss this again. -- Reinhard Pötz Managing Director, {Indoqa} GmbH http://www.indoqa.com/en/people/reinhard.poetz/ Member of the Apache Software Foundation Apache Cocoon Committer, PMC member [EMAIL PROTECTED] ________________________________________________________________________
