[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON3-22?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12668370#action_12668370
 ] 

Carsten Ziegeler commented on COCOON3-22:
-----------------------------------------

Ok, having worked with the xml consumer interface for years now, I came to the 
conclusion that things get much simpler if you just rely on content handler
It makes using the sax stuff much easier and more convenient - I don't think 
that we need to keep the stax stuff and other impl in sync just for the sake of 
having them in sync.

But please let's do this discussion in the mailing list - i've started an RT 
some days ago about this topic and so far got only positive response (from 
Sylvain)

> Remove XMLConsumer interface
> ----------------------------
>
>                 Key: COCOON3-22
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON3-22
>             Project: Cocoon 3
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: cocoon-sax
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0-alpha-1
>            Reporter: Carsten Ziegeler
>            Assignee: Cocoon Developers Team
>             Fix For: 3.0.0-alpha-2
>
>         Attachments: StAX-classes.png
>
>
> Remove XMLConsumer interface; relying on a content handler which might 
> optionally implement lexical handler is sufficient and simplifies the module

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to