Joerg Heinicke wrote:
> On 14.12.2009 09:33, Reinhard Pötz wrote:
>
>>> On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Joerg
>>> Heinicke<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>>> A long time ago I argued for renaming the FileGenerator to XMLGenerator
>>>> since the generators are usually named after the input they accept
>>>> (Midi,
>>>> HTML, Directory, JSP, JXTemplate, etc.). I'm not sure SAXGenerator
>>>> reflects
>>>> that exactly but it's good enough I guess.
>>
>> I agree that we should have one consistent naming scheme and since we
>> usually use the input type, we shouldn't change it for this case.
>>
>> I see two solutions in order to get a consistent naming of our
>> components:
>>
>> a) We rename SAXGenerator AND StAXGenerator to XMLGenerator
>>
>> or
>>
>> b) We add the SAX prefix to all pipeline components.
>>
>> I'm in favor of a) because SAX or StAX is already part of the package
>> name and looking at the implemented interfaces makes it clear what
>> underlying event mechanism is used.
>
> I agree with your reasoning.
Thanks! Since none objected, I've just committed the changes. The
SAXGenerator/FileGenerator is called XMLGenerator and I also renamed the
StAXGenerator and StAXSerializer to XMLGenerator and XMLSerializer.
--
Reinhard Pötz Managing Director, {Indoqa} GmbH
http://www.indoqa.com/en/people/reinhard.poetz/
Member of the Apache Software Foundation
Apache Cocoon Committer, PMC member [email protected]
________________________________________________________________________
