@Francesco: no objections from my side, +1 @Peter: why do we have the proceed a vote? Isn't lazy consensus enough for that situation? TIA!!!
-Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Peter Hunsberger <peter.hunsber...@gmail.com> wrote: > Makes sense from what I understand of the issue. I think you should just > take a vote... > > Peter Hunsberger > > > > 2012/4/9 Francesco Chicchiriccò <ilgro...@apache.org> >> >> HI all, >> a while ago [1] we discussed (and almost agreed) a new structure for our >> SVN, even though we haven't yet been able to agree on a schedule for >> performing all related activities. >> >> A part of [1] was about moving some modules, used by both C2.2 and C3, to >> an independent place. >> Recently I also proposed to apply some pending changes to some of such >> modules (cocoon-xml, cocoon-servlet-service, ...). >> >> Hence, I would like to move modules under [2], [3] and [4] under a new >> directory [5], create separate trunk, branches and tags subdirs, and modify >> POMs in order to make each module independent. >> >> Do you see any issue with this? >> >> TIA. >> Regards. >> >> [1] >> http://markmail.org/search/?q=subprojects#query:subprojects%20list%3Aorg.apache.cocoon.dev+page:1+mid:d3sinv7vo66pko4m+state:results >> [2] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cocoon/trunk/subprojects/ >> [3] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cocoon/trunk/tools/ >> [4] >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cocoon/trunk/blocks/cocoon-serializers/cocoon-serializers-charsets/ >> [5] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cocoon/subprojects/ >> >> -- >> Francesco Chicchiriccò >> >> Apache Cocoon PMC and Apache Syncope PPMC Member >> http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/ > >
