Hi, I suppose that if we ever manage to release a 2.1.12 package, this will affect us as well. Is the way Forrest propose to solve the issue officially approved ? IMHO, if so, it won't be that hard to modify the Ant build file to produce separate packages with and without external dependencies. Regards, Cédric Le 10/04/2012 09:51, Simone Tripodi a écrit : Good morning David, if an action is required to fix the release, so +1.Cocoon 2.X people: are you following? :) -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 7:40 AM, David Crossley <cross...@apache.org> wrote:Please see the following thread at Apache Forrest which explains the problem with conducting our release vote on a package that contained not only our project sources but also contained other binary files. That thread links to an important discussion at Apache Incubator, etc. Subject: [Proposal] re-release 0.9 with proper source code package http://s.apache.org/mCW There would be a similar situation for the Cocoon-2.1.11 release vote. -David --
Toute modification, édition, utilisation ou diffusion non autorisée est interdite. Anyware Services décline toute responsabilité au titre de ce Message s'il a été altéré, déformé, falsifié ou édité, diffusé sans autorisation. |
- an issue with Cocoon source package release vote David Crossley
- Re: an issue with Cocoon source package release vo... Simone Tripodi
- Re: an issue with Cocoon source package releas... Cédric Damioli
- Re: an issue with Cocoon source package re... Jasha Joachimsthal