On 13/12/23 15:00, Cédric Damioli wrote:
Hi,
Following and according to last weeks' discussions, it seems that the general
consensus would be to retire 2.1 (too old to be maintained) and 3.0 (too alpha
to be maintained), and keep 2.x around for now.
If I try to summarize what have been said, refocusing on a single product would
give the project a chance to 1) provide a clear upgrade path to existing 2.1
users and 2) gather renewed interest.
For the still many existing 2.1 users, this would give a clear signal that it's
time to consider other options.
It's now time to formally vote:
[ ] +1 accept (retire and officially stop the maintenance of 2.1/3.0 branches,
only keeping 2.x)
[ ] -1 reject (explanation required)
A minimum of 3 binding +1 votes and more binding +1 than binding -1 are
required to pass.
This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
+1
Regards.
--
Francesco Chicchiriccò
Tirasa - Open Source Excellence
http://www.tirasa.net/
Member at The Apache Software Foundation
Syncope, Cocoon, Olingo, CXF, OpenJPA, PonyMail
http://home.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
