If you do stick with the xdocs/ directory, though, you'll have to override the location of the site.xml (at least I did for maven 2 in the email 1.1release).
On 9/28/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 9/28/07, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So, do I just copy my old xdocs into the src/site directory and it'll > > pick it up as usual? > > Yes - except navigation.xml - AFAIK maven2 uses site.xml - which is > similar > > Niall > > > On 9/28/07, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 9/28/07, James Carman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > All, > > > > > > > > How does the maven 2 build pick up the files in the xdocs directory? > > > > > > I believe its maven2 magic - to make moving from maven1 as painless as > possible. > > > > > > > I'm moving stuff around in commons proxy and I thought that the > maven > > > > 2 build would not pick up my site stuff from the xdocs directory, > but > > > > it does. I'd rather the xdocs stuff be placed in the src/site > > > > directory instead (to follow the maven standard a bit better). Will > > > > that work? > > > > > > Yes - the only reason for sticking with xdocs would be to keep a > > > maven1 build working. Better IMO to go with the default maven2 layout > > > if you're going to use that as the primary build mechanism. > > > > > > Niall > > > > > > > James > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
